SBMA organization essays

SBMA organization essays The organization of the Subic Bay Metropolitan Authority (SBMA) was changed several times since it was established in 1992. During the period of 1992 to 1998, the organization exhibit exceptional control features something that the present leadership consciously slowly decentralized during the period of 1998 to 2002. In the same period, SBMA re-organized its structure twice with the second consisting of minor changes as recommended by the Civil Service Commission (CSC) and the Department of Budget and Management (DBM). However, in its effort to share functions, particularly the operations functions, additional layers of administrative levels were added making the complex, even more complex. All the three SBMA organizations had several note worthy features; 1.) the authority of the chairman of the board and the administrator is vested in one person; 2.) several departments reports directly to the chairman and administrator; 3.) there is a layer that separates the administrator and his deputy administrator. In the 1992 organization, this was the chief operating officer (COO) and in the present set-up, three senior deputy administrators replaced the COO; 4.) the administrative groups are a cross mixture of related and non-related departments. In one group, it is typical to have a regulatory department and staff function office; and lastly, in actual operations, some department and divisions do not follow the chain of command. During the 2001 strategic planning session, I had the chance to review in depth the SBMA organization. The objective of the review is to prepare the organization to meet the current conditions and prepare a recommendation should it be necessary. The review opened up many challenges and issues related to the way the organization was structured and organized. We realized that the organization required a thorough organizational development including the restructuring of the div ...

Qualifier Words in English

Qualifier Words in English In English grammar, a  qualifier is a word or phrase  (such as very) that precedes an adjective or adverb, increasing or decreasing the quality signified by the word it modifies.   Here are some of the most common qualifiers in English (though a number of these words have other functions as well): very, quite, rather, somewhat, more, most, less, least, too, so, just, enough, indeed, still, almost, fairly, really, pretty, even, a bit, a little, a (whole) lot, a good deal, a great deal, kind of, sort of. Compare their usage with  intensifiers, which amplify what they modify and are adjectives or adverbs, and  degree adverbs, which can modify verbs and other modifiers. Some qualifiers have more limited usage contexts than others. In the third edition of English Grammar: A University Course, Angela Downing illustrates, using fairly:   Fairly  as a modifier indicates an almost large or reasonable degree of a quality (fairly accurate, fairly well-off). It can be used more easily with favourable and neutral adjectives than with strongly  unfavourable  ones, as with  fairly honest, fairly intelligent, fairly reasonable, but not  ?fairly dishonest, ?fairly foolish, ?fairly [sic] unreasonable: He seems to have a  fairly  good idea  of what he wants to do. (Routledge, 2014) Writing Advice An over-reliance on qualifiers is a sign of amateurish writing. To improve your writing, go through your text and find all the qualifiers. Take them out wherever you can. As needed, revise the sentences or sections relying heavily  on them to give more detail  and more specifics. Use better verbs in the sentences or description to show- rather than tell- whats going on. Then you wont even need the qualifiers, because the imagery or the argument will be painted much more thoroughly for the reader. Qualifiers have their place, Mignon Fogarty advises, but make sure theyre not just taking up space (Grammar Girl Presents the Ultimate Writing Guide for Students, 2011).   The famous writing book by William Strunk Jr. and E.B. White has more strict advice:   Avoid the use of  qualifiers.  Rather, very, little, pretty- these are the leeches that infest the pond of prose, sucking the blood of words. The constant use of the adjective  little  (except to indicate size) is particularly debilitating; we should all try to do a little better, we should all be very watchful of this rule, for it is a rather important one, and we are pretty sure to violate it now and then. (The Elements of Style, 3rd ed. Macmillan, 1979) Qualifiers vs. Adverbs Qualifiers seem to work like adverbs- and theyll even be in the dictionary listed as such- but they differ slightly from your basic adverb.  Thomas P. Klammer and Muriel R. Schulz explained:   Traditional grammarians usually classified qualifiers as adverbs of degree, and at first glance, judging on the basis of meaning and function, this seems reasonable. Degree adverbs- like  completely, absolutely, extremely,  and  excessively- can fit into the same position as the prototype, and they have similar meanings.However, qualifiers are not true adverbs; they fail to fulfill several of the criteria for adverbs....First, qualifiers do not modify verbs....Second, with one or two exceptions, like  really  and  fairly, qualifiers do not have adverb derivational  suffixes. Third, qualifiers cannot be made  comparative  or  superlative....And fourth, qualifiers do not  intensify. (Analyzing English Grammar. Allyn and Bacon, 1992)